Skip to content

BB1 vs BB5: house prices per square metre compared

BB1 (Rishton) is the more expensive of the two: a median of £1,923 per against £1,609 in BB5 (Oswaldtwistle)BB5 is 16% cheaper per . The figures come from 434 and 447 sales with an EPC-matched floor area in the last 12 months of HM Land Registry data.

BB1

Rishton, Blackburn

High confidence

£1,923median per m²

Median sale price
£168,000
Middle 60% of sales (p20–p80)
£1,346 – £2,500
Sales (last 12 months)
474
With a matched floor area
434
Mean floor area (matched sales)
93 m²
Change over 10 years
+61.2%
All BB1 sold prices

BB5

Oswaldtwistle, Accrington

High confidence

£1,609median per m²

Median sale price
£140,000
Middle 60% of sales (p20–p80)
£1,098 – £2,535
Sales (last 12 months)
680
With a matched floor area
447
Mean floor area (matched sales)
89 m²
Change over 10 years
+69.6%
All BB5 sold prices

Side by side

Every figure covers sales in the last 12 months, on the same dataset and the same method for both areas.

BB1 compared with BB5
MeasureBB1BB5Difference
Median price per m²£1,923£1,609−16%
Median sale price£168,000£140,000−17%
Sales (last 12 months)474680+206
Change over 10 years+61.2%+69.6%+8.4 pts

By property type

Median price per m² for each property type sold in the last 12 months. Only types with matched sales are listed, and a dash means too few sales to publish.

Median price per m² by property type
Property typeBB1BB5
Detached£2,569n = 40£2,717n = 56
Semi-detached£2,270n = 187£2,461n = 112
Terraced£1,406n = 187£1,262n = 268
Flat£1,678n = 20£1,431n = 11

Or browse the league tables for the most expensive and best value districts, every comparison page, or the free dataset behind these figures.

Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026 · Licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 · Floor areas from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register · how these figures are made